{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"On Our Means and Our Perspectives\n","author_name":"Constant \u25aa \nPaul Hammond (translation)","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"https:\/\/licra.at\/on-our-means-and-our-perspectives.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/licra.at\/on-our-means-and-our-perspectives.html'\u003EOn Our Means and Our Perspectives\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003EThe following three documents are the notes of a debate begun by Constant in the SI in September. The second text sets out, in response, the position of the editorial committee of this review, following a discussion with Asger Jorn.\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E1\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003ERe-reading Jorns writings (“Against Functionalism,” “Structure and Change,” etc.), it’s obvious to me that some of the ideas expressed therein must be attacked directly. To me, these ideas as well as his pictorial activity seem indefensible vis-\u00e0-vis \u003Ca href=\"..\/on-our-means-and-our-perspectives.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}