{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"The Question of Organization for the SI\n","author_name":"Guy-Ernest Debord \u25aa \nPoint Blank (translation)","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"https:\/\/licra.at\/the-question-of-organization-for.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/licra.at\/the-question-of-organization-for.html'\u003EThe Question of Organization for the SI\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003E1. Up until now, everything for which the SI has been known belongs to an age that is fortunately over (more precisely, it can be said that this was the “second period,” if the activity that centered around the supersession of art from 1957 to 1962 is counted as the first).\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E2. The new revolutionary tendencies of current society, however weak and confused they may still be, are no longer restricted to a clandestine scope: this year they are appearing in the street.\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003E3. Parallel to \u003Ca href=\"..\/the-question-of-organization-for.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}